Help with Syncing Audio to Video!?

in case you could not detect a sensible converter, i desire to advise you Altysoft Video converter It helps such a good number of units and video codecs, including: iPod, iPhone, PSP, Zune, Xbox, Nokia, avi, wmv, 3gp, mov, flv and extra into avi, mov, asf, wmv, mp4, 3gp and others. Altysoft Video Converter is an fairly undemanding and effectual DVD ripping utility, that may convert DVD to numerous codecs. Altysoft Video Converter can help reproduction entire DVD on your difficult diver, then you definately can burn them to scrub DVD utilising burning utility. Beside above-pronounced applications, it fairly undemanding to acquire YouTube movies from YouTube website, in basic terms specify the URL for the video you desire to acquire

1. Which DSLR Camera is the best for a beginner?

The one in your hands. Find a dealer, look at what Pentax, Sony (not a true DSLR, but better for video), Canon, and Nikon have to offer in your price-range, and choose the one that feels best when you pick it up.

2. how to zoom on a video?

This is an edit to my question: I also need to know how to get rid of the bandicam watermark/logo on the top of the screen using Windows live movie maker

3. How to password protect my video clips, or the folder containing video clips?.?

encrypt and compress them with winrar

4. Rape video on phone

This sounds like it would fall under the "extreme pornography" part of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Section 63:(7) An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, any of the following-(b) an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals,and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real. (7A) An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, either of the following-(b) an act which involves the non-consensual sexual penetration of a person's vagina or anus by another with a part of the other person's body or anything else,and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that the persons were real. What you describe would likely result in serious injury to the victim, and the video appears to be non-consensual.Note that the actual origin is not relevant; if the videos were actually a brilliant piece of special effects and no anuses were harmed that gets you nowhere. The only thing that matters is what a "reasonable person" looking at the videos would have thought. Context might make a difference; if the videos were made by an identifiable company then a reasonable person might assume the producers would have at least obtained consent and complied with their local laws about safety. OTOH if they look like they were filmed on someone's phone and downloaded from some sketchy file-sharing site then a jury is likely to see this as suggesting to the "reasonable person" that the acts shown were real and non-consensual.Edit in response to comment:The law in question says 'An image is "pornographic" if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal'. So it can still be porn even if it was not filmed consensually. If "pornography" could only refer to consensual images then the prosecution would need to obtain evidence of the consent or otherwise of the participants. This might be impossible if a participant is dead or cannot be identified. Also the definition above matches both the dictionary definition and most people's idea of what makes something "porn"; the point of porn is sexual arousal

5. Midnight release of video games?

Yes you have to have a parent or guardian that is 18 or older and they must have proof of age and the midnight release is on Tuesday 1:00am

6. Is this a valid counterargument to this video?

It's disconnected a bit. You made great efforts to make bananas and "cavendish" separate and identifying what we eat are cavendish. And then you talk about bananas. I am not sure why. Also, I would guess/wonder if there were areas of bananas that did not have monkeys nearby. But the reasoning sounds plausible. Also, I disagree that bananas need to be opened and eaten by another organism for it to reproduce.